Leveraging technology in academic healthcare research

S Chethan Kumar

doi:10.51131/IJPCCR/v2i3.22

Article

Leveraging technology in academic healthcare research

VIEWS 1431
PDF 432

International Journal of Preclinical and Clinical Research

DOI: 10.51131/IJPCCR/v2i3.22

Year: 2021, Volume: 2, Issue: 3, Pages: 56-57

Commentaries

Leveraging technology in academic healthcare research

S Chethan Kumar¹,^2*

¹Clinical Research Consultant, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga 577502, Karnataka, India
²Co-founder & CEO, Karnataka, ResearchNeeds, Davangere, India

*Corresponding Author
Email: [email protected]

Received Date:11 October 2021, Accepted Date:10 November 2021, Published Date:26 November 2021

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Technology is continuously evolving, and adopting the technology in research, especially in data management, is of utmost required. In India, researchers in most medical schools still rely on paper-based data collection methods for their academic research. Many times, it results in loss of data or errors at the end of the study. A handful of studies suggest that EDC systems can accelerate clinical studies, reduce the overall duration, and reduce data errors. Considering all these benefits, wider adoption of the technology in clinical studies is required among Indian researchers.

Keywords: EDC; Academic Research; eCRF

References

Zbrozek A, Hebert J, Gogates G, Thorell R, Dell C, Molsen E, et al. Validation of Electronic Systems to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data—Recommendations for Clinical Trial Teams: Report of the ISPOR ePRO Systems Validation Good Research Practices Task Force. Value in Health. 2013;16(4):480–489. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.002
Dillon DG, Pirie F, Rice S, Pomilla C, Sandhu MS, Motala AA, et al. Open-source electronic data capture system offered increased accuracy and cost-effectiveness compared with paper methods in Africa. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014;67(12):1358–1363. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.012
Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Levine JG, Slawsby EA, Nedeljkovic SS, Katz NP. Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain. 2001;91(3):277–285. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00450-4
Groen RS, Samai M, Petroze RT, Kamara TB, Yambasu SE, Calland JF, et al. Pilot Testing of a Population-based Surgical Survey Tool in Sierra Leone. World Journal of Surgery. 2012;36(4):771–774. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1448-9
Thriemer K, Ley B, Ame SM, Puri MK, Hashim R, Chang NY, et al. Replacing paper data collection forms with electronic data entry in the field: findings from a study of community-acquired bloodstream infections in Pemba, Zanzibar. BMC Research Notes. 2012;5(1):113. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-113
Mukasa O, Mushi HP, Maire N, Ross A, Savigny Dd. Do surveys with paper and electronic devices differ in quality and cost? Experience from the Rufiji Health and demographic surveillance system in Tanzania. Global Health Action. 2017;10(1):1387984. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1387984
Litchfield J, Freeman J, Schou H, Elsley M, Fuller R, Chubb B. Is the future for clinical trials internet-based? A cluster randomized clinical trial. Clinical Trials. 2005;2(1):72–79. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1740774505cn069oa
Pattyn B. Comparison of Electronic Data Capture with Paper Data Collection - Is There Really An Advantage? . Pharmatech. 2003;p. 1–4.

Copyright

© 2021 Kumar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Basaveshwara Medical College & Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka.